Editorial policy

Inspired Public Review aims to make its explanations careful, legible and fair. We separate what is observable from what is interpretation, and make room for context where a subject has more than one reading.

Accuracy and context

Writers should check names, descriptions and factual claims against suitable sources, and avoid presenting assumptions as established facts. Pieces should give readers enough context to understand the subject without overstating what a single example can show.

Independence

Editorial choices are made for relevance to the publication, not to secure favourable coverage for a partner or contributor. If a relationship could affect how a piece is understood, it should be disclosed clearly alongside the relevant material.

Corrections

If a reader spots a possible error, please send the page and a clear explanation through Contact. We review correction requests, amend confirmed factual errors and make the change visible where appropriate. Questions of interpretation may call for clarification rather than a factual correction.

Partner material and illustrations

Paid or partner-supported material is identified plainly where it appears and is kept distinct from independent editorial coverage. Some illustrations are AI-generated; when used, they are identified as such and are not presented as documentary images of a real place or event.